Friday, October 23, 2015

Alma 43:1-4

Chapter 43

Alma and his sons preach the word—The Zoramites and other Nephite dissenters become Lamanites—The Lamanites come against the Nephites in war—Moroni arms the Nephites with defensive armor—The Lord reveals to Alma the strategy of the Lamanites—The Nephites defend their homes, liberties, families, and religion—The armies of Moroni and Lehi surround the Lamanites. About 74 B.C.

In Chapter 43, Mormon changes his focus. “And now I, Mormon, proceed to finish out my record, which I take from the plates of Nephi; and I make it according to the knowledge and the understanding which God has given me” (Words of Mormon 1:9).  To this point, they record has been of a religious nature.  He tells us he will no longer discuss the preaching of Alma and his sons, except to say, “they preached the word and the truth … and they preached after the holy order of God by which they were called” (Alma 43:2).  “And Helaman and the high priests did also maintain order in the church; yea, even for the space of four years did they have much peace and rejoicing in the church” (Alma 46:38).

He now turns to the Lamanite/Nephite wars.  “And also that a knowledge of these things must come unto the remnant of these people, and also unto the Gentiles, who the Lord hath said should scatter this people, and this people should be counted as naught among them—therefore I write a small abridgment, daring not to give a full account of the things which I have seen, because of the commandment which I have received, and also that ye might not have too great sorrow because of the wickedness of this people” (Mormon 5:9).

“And the people of Ammon departed out of the land of Jershon, and came over into the land of Melek, and gave place in the land of Jershon for the armies of the Nephites, that they might contend with the armies of the Lamanites and the armies of the Zoramites; and thus commenced a war betwixt the Lamanites and the Nephites, in the eighteenth year of the reign of the judges; and an account shall be given of their wars hereafter” (Alma 35:13).

Mormon begins his detailed account of the Nephite wars with an explicit editorial shift  … [T]o this point in his narrative he had chosen not to detail even one battle. In further contrast, Mormon had just completed a detailed account of the remarkable spiritual conversions and relatively successful ministries of Alma the Elder, Alma the Younger, and the sons of Mosiah among both the Nephites and Lamanites … After focusing on patently spiritual matters for over 100 pages of text, Mormon makes an abrupt shift in his narrative. He acknowledges that Alma and his sons continued their missions but then explicitly states, “Now we shall say no more concerning their preaching” (Alma 43:2). This shift in focus was not required by a lack of ecclesiastical data; throughout the war narrative, Mormon intermittently refers to their ongoing ministries … Mormon chooses at this point to focus his account of the next century of Nephite history almost exclusively on military conflicts between Lamanites and Nephites, fractious internal Nephite politics, social disintegration, and natural catastrophes…”[1]

In verse 4, we learn how Lamanite is used. Identifying a person or group as Lamanites has nothing to do with racial or genealogical heritage.  The designation of a group as Nephite or Lamanite is a political designation.  We see this when Mormon tells us the Zoramites, who were at one time Nephites, became Lamanites.  “The Book of Mormon is careful to specify that the terms Lamanite and Nephite are used in a loose and general sense to designate not racial but political (e.g., Mormon 1:9), military (Alma 43:4), religious (4 Nephi 1:38), and cultural (Alma 53: 10, IS; 3: 10- 11) divisions and groupings of people. The Lamanite and Nephite division was tribal rather than racial, each of the main groups representing an amalgamat ion of tribes that retained their identity (Alma 43: 13; 4 Nephi 1:36-37).”[2]

It is interesting to note, Alma’s missionary efforts may have been an unintentional consequence of their success among the poor. “And Alma, and Ammon, and their brethren, and also the two sons of Alma returned to the land of Zarahemla, after having been instruments in the hands of God of bringing many of the Zoramites to repentance; and as many as were brought to repentance were driven out of their land; but they have lands for their inheritance in the land of Jershon, and they have taken up arms to defend themselves, and their wives, and children, and their lands” (Alma 35:14). “And it came to pass that as he went forth among the people, yea, among a people who had separated themselves from the Nephites and called themselves Zoramites, being led by a man whose name was Zoram—and as he went forth amongst them, behold, he was run upon and trodden down, even until he was dead” (Alma 30:59).

The Zoramites had defined a society in which the position of the upper classes was dependent upon having a lower class to rule over. Thus the preaching of the Nephite missionaries not only altered the Zoramites’ craft and economic situation, it challenged their carefully constructed identity. Their code had been broken, and this necessitated policing in order to protect the identity of the group. Casting out the believers was an act of both policing and of affirming the ruling class’s position as elites. But instead of solving the problem and returning the society to its norms, that action further disrupted the society and intensified the hatred against the meddlesome Nephites, who were directly responsible for upsetting the social order.[3]

Alma 43:4 picks up the thread of Alma 35:10–11 by explaining that “the Zoramites became Lamanites.” The society that had prided itself on its costly apparel and that had cast the poor from its synagogues because of the coarseness of their clothing was now forced to unite with and rely on a people that Mormon describes as going into battle “naked, save it were a skin which was girded about their loins” (Alma 43:20). Mormon clarifies, however, that the rich Zoramites did not follow the Lamanite customs of war dress: “yea, all were naked, save it were the Zoramites and Amalekites” (43:20). His description of the rich Zoramites running into battle with the naked Lamanites provides a strong visual image that emphasizes the incongruence of the new Zoramite situation.[4]

It is often the case that Nephite dissenters or their descendants incite the Lamanites to wage war on their former “brethren.” Most of the warfare in the century and a half before Christ’s appearance in the promised land results from unresolved factional conflicts within Nephite society that are escalated by personal ambition to civil strife and sedition. The dissensions of the Amlicites, Zoramites, people of Ammonihah, and king-men follow this model. In an ironic fulfillment of the covenant of the promised land, it is usually Nephite dissenters who eventually become the leaders of the Lamanite armies, often by treachery, in order to foment their hatred of the Nephites.[5]


[1] Prophecy and History: Structuring the Abridgment of the Nephite Records, Steven L. Olsen, Journal of Book of Mormon Studies 15/1 (2006): 23.
[2] Hugh Nibley as quoted in Review of El Libro de Mormon ante la crítica (1992), by Josué Sánchez,  Terrence L. Szink Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 5/1 (1993): 225.
[3] The Zoramite Separation, A Sociological Perspective, Sherrie Mills Johnson, Journal of Book of Mormon Studies, Volume 14, Number 1, 2005:85.
[4] The Zoramites and Costly Apparel: Symbolism and, Irony, Parrish Brady and Shon Hopkin, Journal of the Book of Mormon and Other Restoration, Scripture 22/1 (2013): 48.
[5] Prospering in the Land of Promise, Steven L. Olsen, FARMS Review 22/1 (2010): 238.

No comments:

Post a Comment