Tuesday, November 14, 2017

1 Nephi 3:9-21

Who was this Laban with whom they were going to meet? “Laban of Jerusalem epitomizes the seamy side of the world of 600 B.C. as well as Lehi or Jeremiah or Solon do the other side. With a few deft and telling touches Nephi resurrects the pompous Laban with photographic perfection – as only one who actually knew the man could have done. We learn in passing that Laban commanded a garrison of fifty, that he met in full ceremonial armor with ‘the elders of the Jews’ for secret consultations by night, that he had control of the treasury, that he was of the old aristocracy, being a distant relative of Lehi himself, that his house was a depository of very old family records, that he was a large man, short-tempered, crafty, and dangerous, and to the bargain cruel, greedy, unscrupulous, weak, vainglorious, and given to drink.”[1]

Having arrived in the land of Jerusalem, the brothers had to decide who would go to Laban. At this point, Laman appears to be in charge. He will determine who will go and ask Laban for the plates. He apparently is reluctant to decide, so he has them cast lots to determine who will go. The Lord wanted to demonstrate to Laman this was a hard and possibly impossible task. When they eventually get the plates, the Lord is demonstrating to Laman they only way they could get the plates was through the Lord’s intervention.[2]

The brothers, “in the immemorial and inevitable manner of the desert, drew lots to see who would go in to Laban.”[3] The lot fell to Laman. It was appropriate Laman, as the oldest son, first attempt to obtain the plates.[4]

Laman went to Laban and made the request for the plates of brass.

We have no idea what occurred during Laman’s meeting with Laban. What we do know is that, for some reason, Laban became angry at Laman. He accused him of being a robber and threatened to kill him. “Since Laban had falsely accused Laman of being a ‘robber’ (a serious capital offense) and had sent his soldiers to execute the sons of Lehi on this pretext (1 Nephi 3:13, 25), Laban effectively stood as a false accuser. Such an accusation, coming from a commanding officer of the city, was more than an idle insult; it carried the force of a legal indictment. Since Nephi and his brothers were powerless to rectify that wrong, God was left to discharge justice against Laban.”[5]

Laman was able to escape and return to his brothers in their place of hiding. He and his brothers were ready to call it quits and return home without the plates.

Why was Laban persistent in his efforts to keep the plates? It is obvious he considered them important. It is here we get a sense that records are important in Jerusalem at this time. Through the records we get a sense of history. They also give a sense of the right of leadership to he who possessed the plates.[6]

Laban takes glory in his power. He has an army who will follow his commands. His actions are those of a wicked man. The Lord does give him chances to give up record but he’s not willing because of greed for both power and money and position.[7]

We will learn that Laban’s genealogy ties into Lehi’s at some point. They are probably are distant relatives.[8]

How did Laban end up with the plates? They were a record of Joseph which started with a prophet ended up in hands of wicked man whose society is in apostasy. The Babylonians would look for records like this. By destroying them, they would destroy a culture and a people by getting rid of heritage by destroying their records.[9]

Nephi, however, was not ready to give up. “[W]e will not go down unto our father in the wilderness until we have accomplished the thing which the Lord hath commanded us” (1 Nephi 3:15). He encouraged them to be faithful and to keep the Lord’s commandments. He then told them to return “to the land of their father’s inheritance.” This tells us that Lehi did not live in the Jerusalem proper. In fact, the land in question was probably not a part of the land of Jerusalem.

He reminded his brothers that Lehi knew Jerusalem would be destroyed. The people rejected the prophets and had become a wicked people. The Lord commanded Lehi to take his family and escape the destruction of Jerusalem.

He told them that they must have the records to “preserve unto our children the language of our fathers” (1 Nephi 3:19). This turns out to be an incorrect assumption on Nephi’s part. King Benjamin would explain the importance of the plates to his sons.

“And [King Benjamin] also taught [his three sons] concerning the records which were engraven on the plates of brass, saying: My sons, I would that ye should remember that were it not for these plates, which contain these records and these commandments, we must have suffered in ignorance, even at this present time, not knowing the mysteries of God.
“For it were not possible that our father, Lehi, could have remembered all these things, to have taught them to his children, except it were for the help of these plates; for he having been taught in the language of the Egyptians therefore he could read these engravings, and teach them to his children, that thereby they could teach them to their children, and so fulfilling the commandments of God, even down to this present time” (Mosiah 1:3–4).

Nephi was correct when he told them that the words of the prophets must be preserved. Nephi convinces his brothers to go back to their home, get their wealth, and use it to purchase the brass plates. In verses 22-23, we read they left Jerusalem and “went down” to their former residence. Having gathered things together, they left and “went up” again into Jerusalem. From this, we can imply Lehi’s residence was not in Jerusalem but some distance outside the city.

Earlier in the record, Nephi referred to this land as “the land of our father’s inheritance.” In verse 22, Nephi refers to this as “the land of our inheritance.” Apparently, it was intended this land was to be passed on to his sons.[10]



[1] Escapade in Jerusalem, Hugh W. Nibley, Provo, Utah: Maxwell Institute.
[2] Discussions on the Book of Mormon, 1 Nephi 3-7, KBYU, Dr. Clyde Williams.
[3] Portrait of Laban, Hugh W. Nibley, Provo, Utah: Maxwell Institute.
[4] Discussions on the Book of Mormon, 1 Nephi 3-7, KBYU, Dr. Paul Hoskisson.
[5] Legal Perspectives on the Slaying of Laban, John W. Welch, Provo, Utah: Maxwell Institute.
[6] Discussions on the Book of Mormon, 1 Nephi 3-7, KBYU, Dr. Gaye Stratheran.
[7] Discussions on the Book of Mormon, 1 Nephi 3-7, KBYU, Dr. Clyde Williams.
[8] Discussions on the Book of Mormon, 1 Nephi 3-7, KBYU, Dr. Paul Hoskisson.
[9] Discussions on the Book of Mormon, 1 Nephi 3-7, KBYU, Dr. Clyde Williams.
[10] Lehi’s House at Jerusalem and the Land of His Inheritance, Jeffrey R. Chadwick, Provo, Utah: Maxwell Institute.

No comments:

Post a Comment