Thursday, May 31, 2012

Alma 62:27-39


27 Now it came to pass that many of the Lamanites that were prisoners were desirous to join the people of Ammon and become a free people. 28 And it came to pass that as many as were desirous, unto them it was granted according to their desires. 29 Therefore, all the prisoners of the Lamanites did join the people of Ammon, and did begin to labor exceedingly, tilling the ground, raising all manner of grain, and flocks and herds of every kind; and thus were the Nephites relieved from a great burden; yea, insomuch that they were relieved from all the prisoners of the Lamanites.
Alma 62:27-29 (Emphasis mine)

After dealing with continual war, the Lamanite prisoners had enough of war.  “Plainly everybody was getting rather tired of war when thousands of Lamanite warriors began to see the light—that the people of Ammon were the really sensible people after all. And so the wicked Lamanites … were dismissed without even a reprimand, and in short order became model citizens of the Nephite realm (Alma 62:29). This also solved the vexing prisoner of war problem.”[1]

It says a lot about the Ammonites that they were willing to accept these Lamanite prisoners into their society.  Here were men who had recently been fighting to destroy the Nephites.  Now these former warriors “were desirous to join the people of Ammon and become a free people.” 

30 Now it came to pass that Moroni, after he had obtained possession of the city of Nephihah, having taken many prisoners, which did reduce the armies of the Lamanites exceedingly, and having regained many of the Nephites who had been taken prisoners, which did strengthen the army of Moroni exceedingly; therefore Moroni went forth from the land of Nephihah to the land of Lehi. 31 And it came to pass that when the Lamanites saw that Moroni was coming against them, they were again frightened and fled before the army of Moroni.

32 And it came to pass that Moroni and his army did pursue them from city to city, until they were met by Lehi and Teancum; and the Lamanites fled from Lehi and Teancum, even down upon the borders by the seashore, until they came to the land of Moroni. 33 And the armies of the Lamanites were all gathered together, insomuch that they were all in one body in the land of Moroni.  Now Ammoron, the king of the Lamanites, was also with them.
Alma 62:30-33 (Emphasis mine)

The numerous prisoners taken and sent to live with the Ammonites reduced the size of the Lamanite army.  The reduced armies fled before Moroni1’s advancing army.  All the Lamanites gathered in the land of Moroni.  And, their king, Ammoron, once again appears in the record.

Hugh Nibley explains the situation.

The Lamanite armies in the field, knowing that the war was going against them, drew together for mutual support, as beaten armies will, but their fighting spirit was kept up by Ammoron, the brother of that Amalickiah who had sworn undying hatred of Moroni, embracing the old philosophy of ‘kill or be killed,’ ‘it is either you or me,’ in which both the conjunctions are wrong, ‘kill and be killed . . . it is you and me’ being the verdict of history.”[2]   (Emphasis mine)

34 And it came to pass that Moroni and Lehi and Teancum did encamp with their armies round about in the borders of the land of Moroni, insomuch that the Lamanites were encircled about in the borders by the wilderness on the south, and in the borders by the wilderness on the east. 35 And thus they did encamp for the night.  For behold, the Nephites and the Lamanites also were weary because of the greatness of the march; therefore they did not resolve upon any stratagem in the night–time, save it were Teancum; for he was exceedingly angry with Ammoron, insomuch that he considered that Ammoron, and Amalickiah his brother, had been the cause of this great and lasting war between them and the Lamanites, which had been the cause of so much war and bloodshed, yea, and so much famine.
Alma 62:34-35 (Emphasis mine)

Both armies “were weary because of the greatness of the march.”  The armies of Moroni1, Lehi2, and Teancum surrounded the Lamanites.  “[T]hey they did not resolve upon any stratagem in the night–time, save it were Teancum.” 

Teancum was not only dissatisfied, but he had enough.  He was angry because of the bloodshed and famine caused by the war.  He laid the blame at the feet of Amalickiah and Ammoron.  They were responsible for all the war, the suffering, and death.

“In fact, war is seen as the destructive force that it is, leading not only to death by violent means but also to famine (see Alma 62:35, 39), either because armies ravage the crops or because farmers must leave their fields to fight and have no time to plant.”[3]

Teancum took matters in his own hands.

36 And it came to pass that Teancum in his anger did go forth into the camp of the Lamanites, and did let himself down over the walls of the city.  And he went forth with a cord, from place to place, insomuch that he did find the king; and he did cast a javelin at him, which did pierce him near the heart.  But behold, the king did awaken his servants before he died, insomuch that they did pursue Teancum, and slew him. 37 Now it came to pass that when Lehi and Moroni knew that Teancum was dead they were exceedingly sorrowful; for behold, he had been a man who had fought valiantly for his country, yea, a true friend to liberty; and he had suffered very many exceedingly sore afflictions.  But behold, he was dead, and had gone the way of all the earth.
Alma 62:36-37 (Emphasis mine)

Teancum went to the Lamanite camp and found Ammoron.  When he did, he thrust a javelin “near the heart.”  Before he died, Ammoron was able to wake up his servants who pursued and killed Teancum. 

Mormon pays tribute to Teancum.  “[H]e had been a man who had fought valiantly for his country, yea, a true friend to liberty; and he had suffered very many exceedingly sore afflictions.”

“Among the Aztecs, one of the few avenues open to a man for social advancement beyond the status of his parents was to demonstrate valor in combat. If he proved himself valiant, which included vanquishing his enemies by cutting off their arms, he could gain such privileges as the right to enjoy special foods and dress in fine clothing. It would make sense that in an earlier era among the Nephites and Lamanites, superior performance in the frequent wars would have enhanced social prestige in a similar way. One considers, for example, the high esteem in which the warrior Teancum was held for an act of daring (see Alma 62:37).”[4] (Emphasis mine)

38 Now it came to pass that Moroni marched forth on the morrow, and came upon the Lamanites, insomuch that they did slay them with a great slaughter; and they did drive them out of the land; and they did flee, even that they did not return at that time against the Nephites. 39 And thus ended the thirty and first year of the reign of the judges over the people of Nephi [60 B.C.]; and thus they had had wars, and bloodsheds, and famine, and affliction, for the space of many years.
Alma 62:38-39 (Emphasis mine)

The next day Moroni1 took the battle to the Lamanites.  The Nephites “did slay them with a great slaughter; and they did drive them out of the land; and they did flee, even that they did not return at that time against the Nephites.”  The war was over.

The great war with the Lamanites consumer chapters.  Yet, the final battle that defeats the Lamanites is covered in one verse (38).[5]

“Ammoron suffered the same fate as his brother when Teancum tried to repeat his former performance by stabbing the king in his tent—he succeeded but lost his own life in the attempt (Alma 62:33—36). With the death of their leader, the Lamanites finally withdrew. Then Moroni made a careful inspection of all the country's defenses and went into retirement (Alma 62:38—43).”[6]


[1] A Rigorous Test: Military History, Hugh Nibley, Provo, Utah: Maxwell Institute, accessed May 31, 2012.
[3] Women in the Book of Mormon, Camille Williams, Provo, Utah: Maxwell Institute, May 31, 2012.
[4] Ammon and the Mesoamerican Custom of Smiting off Arms, Bruce H. Yerman, Provo, Utah: Maxwell Institute, accessed May 31, 2012.
[5] "Their Fathers" - Letters and Autobiography, Richard Dilworth Rust, Provo, Utah: Maxwell Institute, accessed May 31, 2012.
[6] Op cit., Nibley

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Alma 62:15-26


15 And it came to pass that as they were marching towards the land, they took a large body of men of the Lamanites, and slew many of them, and took their provisions and their weapons of war. 16 And it came to pass after they had taken them, they caused them to enter into a covenant that they would no more take up their weapons of war against the Nephites. 17 And when they had entered into this covenant they sent them to dwell with the people of Ammon, and they were in number about four thousand who had not been slain.

18 And it came to pass that when they had sent them away they pursued their march towards the land of Nephihah.  And it came to pass that when they had come to the city of Nephihah, they did pitch their tents in the plains of Nephihah, which is near the city of Nephihah.
Alma 62:15-18 (Emphasis mine)

As Moroni1 and Pahoran marched, they met a large body of Lamanites.  A battle broke out and the Lamanites were eventually defeated.  The survivors, numbering about 4,000, surrendered and entered “into a covenant that they would not more take up their weapons of war against the Nephites.”  This satisfied Moroni1.  John Welch explained the seriousness of this covenant.

Such covenants were taken seriously. After defeating a Lamanite army, Moroni and Pahoran caused those who had not been slain "to enter into a covenant that they would no more take up their weapons of war against the Nephites. And when they had entered into this covenant, they sent them to dwell with the people of Ammon, and they were in number about four thousand who had not been slain" (Alma 62:16-17). Moroni and Pahoran sent four thousand Lamanite soldiers, who had given nothing more than their word, to live with the defenseless Ammonites![1] (Emphasis mine)

19 Now Moroni was desirous that the Lamanites should come out to battle against them, upon the plains; but the Lamanites, knowing of their exceedingly great courage, and beholding the greatness of their numbers, therefore they durst not come out against them; therefore they did not come to battle in that day. 20 And when the night came, Moroni went forth in the darkness of the night, and came upon the top of the wall to spy out in what part of the city the Lamanites did camp with their army. 21 And it came to pass that they were on the east, by the entrance; and they were all asleep.  And now Moroni returned to his army, and caused that they should prepare in haste strong cords and ladders, to be let down from the top of the wall into the inner part of the wall.
Alma 62:19-21 (Emphasis mine)

Moroni1 issued a challenge to the Lamanites after camping around the city.  The Lamanites seeing they were outmatched, refused to come out to battle.

That evening, Moroni1 went out to spy and learn what he could about the Lamanites.  He saw that Lamanites were sleeping on the east side of the city, leaving the west side unguarded.  He prepared to enter the west side of the city.

22 And it came to pass that Moroni caused that his men should march forth and come upon the top of the wall, and let themselves down into that part of the city, yea, even on the west, where the Lamanites did not camp with their armies. 23 And it came to pass that they were all let down into the city by night, by the means of their strong cords and their ladders; thus when the morning came they were all within the walls of the city.

24 And now, when the Lamanites awoke and saw that the armies of Moroni were within the walls, they were affrighted exceedingly, insomuch that they did flee out by the pass. 25 And now when Moroni saw that they were fleeing before him, he did cause that his men should march forth against them, and slew many, and surrounded many others, and took them prisoners; and the remainder of them fled into the land of Moroni, which was in the borders by the seashore. 26 Thus had Moroni and Pahoran obtained the possession of the city of Nephihah without the loss of one soul; and there were many of the Lamanites who were slain.
Alma 62:22-26 (Emphasis mine)

The army entered into the city by sneaking in over the wall on the west side of the city.  By morning, the Nephites were within the city. 

In the morning, seeing the Nephite army inside the city, the Lamanites fled.  They were pursued and many Lamanites died.  Moroni1 surrounded many more Lamanites and took the prisoners.  The rest of the Lamanites were able to escape, fleeing into the land of Moroni, near the seashore. 

Moroni1 and Pahoran successful took back the city of Nephihah.  And, it was done with the loss of one Nephite.


[1] Law and War in the Book of Mormon, John W. Welch, Provo, Utah: Maxwell Institute, accessed May 30, 2012.

Monday, May 28, 2012

Gospel Doctrine Lesson 23


Lesson 23 – More Than One Witness


Scriptures

·         Alma 8-9. After preaching in Melek, Alma calls the people of Ammonihah to repentance, but they reject him. He leaves but is commanded by an angel to return. Alma is received by Amulek, and both are commanded to preach in Ammonihah.
·         Alma 10. Amulek preaches to the people of Ammonihah and describes his conversion. The people are astonished that there is another witness to Alma’s teachings. Amulek contends with unrighteous lawyers and judges.
·         Alma 11. Amulek contends with Zeezrom and testifies of the coming of Christ, the judgment of the wicked, and the plan of redemption.
·         Alma 12. Alma further explains Amulek's words, warning against hard-heartedness and wickedness and testifying of the Fall and the plan of redemption.

Once again, we have a huge amount of scripture to cover in 45 minutes.  As with Lesson 22, the key is to review the four chapters and determine the most important concepts in the chapters.

What are the most important concepts?  With so little time, I feel like Snoopy when he said, “Curse you, Red Baron!”  There is so much great and important information.  From the “For What It’s Worth” department, here are my recommendations. (I will bold and italicize what I believe are the most important concepts.)

§  Skip Chapter 8.  In Chapter 10, Amulek reviews how he met Alma2.  
§  A major part of Chapter 9 is Alma2’s warning to the people of Ammonihah is that, if they don’t repent, they will be destroyed.  I would suggest you, at the least, touch on the Law of Apostate Cities chart.  You may want to make a few copies to hand out and review it with your class.
§  Alma 9:7-11 is a list of rhetorical questions Alma2 asks that outline the wickedness of the people.
§  Alma 9:13-19 - Alma2 compares the status of the Nephites with the Lamanites.
§  Alma 9:20-23 - Alma2 explains what they have received from the Lord and why they will be destroyed.
§  Alma 9:26-28 – Coming of the Son of God.
§  Alma 10:1-4 – Amulek introduces self.
§  Alma 10:5-11 – Recounts conversion story.
§  Alma 10:12-32 – A must! Amulek second witness; lawyers question and challenge Amulek.
§  Alma 11:1-20 – Nephite monetary system.  I would recommend little time be spent on the actual values.  This, however, is a must!  Critics point out no coins have been found to attack Book of Mormon.  It needs to be pointed out that nowhere in the Book of Mormon record is the word coin or coinage found.  The only place the word “coinage” is found is in the heading of Chapter 11, which is a modern day addition!
§  Alma 11:21-46 – A must! Zeezrom’s questioning of Amulek and his powerful responses.

Mormon writes a summary heading of chapters 9-14, telling us what we will read.  Note that he tells us we are now reading “[t]he words of Alma.”  These next six chapters are not an abridgement, but a copy of the actual record on the plates.

The words of Alma, and also the words of Amulek, which were declared unto the people who were in the land of Ammonihah.  And also they are cast into prison, and delivered by the miraculous power of God which was in them, according to the record of Alma.
Comprising chapters 9 to 14 inclusive.
Chapter 9

Alma commands the people of Ammonihah to repent—The Lord will be merciful to the Lamanites in the last days—If the Nephites forsake the light, they shall be destroyed by the Lamanites—The Son of God soon cometh—He shall redeem those who repent and are baptized and have faith in his name. About 82 B.C.

Alma2 is prophesying the destruction of Ammonihah in one day if the people do not repent. 

Why would the Lord destroy an entire people and all the people therein? 

The Israelites were commanded to destroy apostate cities; however, there were conditions that must be met.  The chart below compares Deuteronomy 13:12-18 with the conditions in Ammonihah (Alma 9-16).[1]

The Law of Apostate Cities

12 ¶ If thou shalt hear say in one of thy cities, which the LORD thy God hath given thee to dwell there, saying,
13 Certain men, the children of Belial, are gone out from among you, and have withdrawn the inhabitants of their city, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which ye have not known;
14 Then shalt thou enquire, and make search, and ask diligently; and, behold, if it be truth, and the thing certain, that such abomination is wrought among you;
15 Thou shalt surely smite the inhabitants of that city with the edge of the sword, destroying it utterly, and all that is therein, and the cattle thereof, with the edge of the sword.
16 And thou shalt gather all the spoil of it into the midst of the street thereof, and shalt burn with fire the city, and all the spoil thereof every whit, for the LORD thy God: and it shall be an heap for ever; it shall not be built again.
17  And there shall cleave nought of the cursed thing to thine hand: that the LORD may turn from the fierceness of his anger, and shew thee mercy, and have compassion upon thee, and multiply thee, as he hath sworn unto thy fathers;
18  When thou shalt hearken to the voice of the LORD thy God, to keep all his commandments which I command thee this day, to do that which is right in the eyes of the LORD thy God.
Deuteronomy 13:12-18

Deuteronomy 13:12-18
Ammonihah (Alma 9-16)
certain men gone out from among you
Nehorites
withdrawn the inhabitants of their city
withdrew from Nephites
serve other gods
turned from God
children of Belial
Satan had great hold
inquire and search diligently
Alma2 visits personally
smite all inhabitants with the sword
everyone killed
destroy utterly
everything destroyed
a heap forever
bodies heaped up
abomination
desolation of Nehors

Hugh Nibley sums up the situation Alma2 faces.
·         “But first Alma was preaching to them. Was it the same old thing here? Well, it was different because they put up a fight. They argued back. They shouted back and forth. It turned out to be a shouting match. Alma began to preach to the people, and he said (chapter 9, verse 1): ‘As I began to preach unto them, they began to contend with me, saying … This is Alma's own record here; before it was [Mormon’s] record. They said, you have no clout—we don't know who you are … they said, ‘Suppose ye that we shall believe the testimony of one man, although he should preach unto us that the earth should pass away? Now they understood not the words which they spake; for they knew not that the earth should pass away.’ They were pronouncing the doom on themselves. Their city was buried completely.”[2]

Review of scriptures in Chapter 9

·         1-6 – people’s response to Alma2.
·         7-11 – Alma2 asks questions and makes points.
o   8 – How have ye forgotten the tradition of your fathers?
o   8 – How soon you have forgotten the commandments of God.
o   9 - Do ye not remember that our father, Lehi, was brought out of Jerusalem by the hand of God? 
o   9 - Do ye not remember that they were all led by him through the wilderness?
o   10 - Have ye forgotten so soon how many times he delivered our fathers out of the hands of their enemies,
o   10 – Have ye forgotten he preserved them from being destroyed, even by the hands of their own brethren?
o   11 - Without the matchless power, mercy and longsuffering of God towards us, we would have been cutoff from the face of the Earth and possibly been consigned to a state of endless misery and woe.
·         Verses 10-11, raise questions.  What were the events that required the Lord to deliver them from their enemies?  Who were these enemies?   Who were the brethren?  What were the events?  It also raises a possibility that we might have information that was in the lost 116 manuscript pages.
·         David LeFevre explains:
o   “Lehi's lost record surely had more to say about the hardships experienced during this part of the journey. We get that impression both from King Benjamin (Mosiah 1:17) and Alma (Alma 36:28—29). Additionally intriguing are Alma's words to the people of Ammonihah, which invite them to remember ‘the tradition of [their] fathers’ (Alma 9:8), meaning ‘our father, Lehi’ who was ‘brought out of Jerusalem by the hand of God’ (9:9). In the next breath, Alma reiterates how the Lord ‘delivered our fathers out of the hands of their enemies, and preserved them’ (9:10). That ‘our fathers’ refers to Lehi and his family seems apparent from verses 9 and 13.  From Brown's observations and these indications from the text, it appears that the family spent significant time (perhaps most or, in my reading of the text, even all of the eight years) and conceivably suffered bondage in the passage between the Nahom area and Bountiful.” [3]
·         S. Kent Brown writes:
o   “In an earlier address to people in Ammonihah, Alma recounted that ‘our father, Lehi, was brought out of Jerusalem by the hand of God . . . through the wilderness. Immediately thereafter Alma asked the question: ‘have ye forgotten . . . how many times he delivered our fathers out of the hands of their enemies, and preserved them from being destroyed?’ (Alma 9:9–10). Enemies? Destroyed? Do these expressions fit into a picture of Lehi in the desert? To be sure, the phrase ‘our fathers’ may point to an intermediate generation, nearer Alma's time, who had suffered difficulties with ‘their enemies’ But the context also allows the possibility that Lehi, too, had experienced troubles with ‘enemies...' [14]
“Footnote 14. The notation that immediately follows—‘even by the hands of their own brethren’ (Alma 9:10)—opens further the possibility that the reference is to Lehi and his children since the older sons sought at least once to kill Lehi (1 Nephi 16:37; 17:44) and three times to kill the younger son Nephi (1 Nephi 7:16; 16:37; 2 Nephi 5:3–4; cf. 2 Nephi 1:24), even though the word brethren’ can refer to unfriendly Lamanites (e.g., Mosiah 28:1; Alma 17:9; 48:21).” [4]
·         12-13 – Calls the people to repentance.
o   12 – Repent or you cannot inherit the kingdom of God.
o   12  - Repent or you will be utterly destroyed from off the face of the earth.
o   13 – You don’t remember words He spoke to Lehi – if ye keep my commandments, prosper in the land.
o   13 – If you don’t keep commandments, you will be cutoff from the presence of the Lord.
·         14-17 – Alma2 talks about the Lamanites.
o   14 – Lamanites haven’t kept commandments and they have been cutoff; Lord’s word has been verified in that the Lamanites have been cutoff.
o   15 – Shall be more tolerable for Lamanites in the day of judgment if “you” remain in your sins; more tolerable for Lamanites in this life except “ye” repent.
o   16 – Many promises had been made to the Lamanites; remain in state of ignorance of gospel because of traditions of their fathers. (See Mosiah 10:13-17); Lord will be merciful to them.
o   Daniel C. Peterson wrote about the term “traditions of the fathers.”
§  “Typically, when the scriptures allude to ‘the traditions of men’ or ‘the traditions of the fathers,’ they are speaking negatively about the false notions that hinder people from recognizing and accepting the truth (e.g., at 1 Peter 1:18; D&C 74:4; 93:39). ‘Why do ye . . . transgress the commandment of God by your tradition?’ the Savior asked his audience (Matthew 15:3). ‘For laying aside the commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men’ (Mark 7:8). The Lamanites, too, were misled by the false traditions of their fathers (Mosiah 1:5; 10:12-3; Alma 9:16; 60:32; Helaman 15:4).
“Salvation therefore consists, at least partially, in overcoming false traditions(Alma 9:17; Helaman 5:51; 15:7-8; D&C 74:6-7), and, accordingly, it is part of the goal of those who preach the true gospel to lead people to see the incorrectness of the traditions they have previously been taught (Alma 17:9; 24:7).”  [5]
o   17 – Eventually, Lamanites will believe the gospel and reject traditions.
o   17 – Many Lamanites will be saved.
o   17 - Lord merciful to all who call on his name.
·         18-19 – Repent or be destroyed.
·         18 – Persist in wickedness, and don’t repent, Lamanites will destroy you.
·         19 – Lord not suffer them to live in their sins; will not suffer the people to destroy Lord’s people; rather have Lamanites destroy people of Nephi; this because of having much light and knowledge from the Lord.
·         20-23 – Alma2 teaches why the will be destroyed.  They had received much from God.  Here’s the list.
o   They have been given much light and knowledge.
o   They were highly favored of the Lord.
o   They were favored above all nations, kindreds, tongues, and people.
o   They had all things made known to them according to their desires.
o   They had been visited by the Spirit of God.
o   They had conversed with angels.
o   They had been spoken to by the Lord.
o   They had the spirit of prophecy and the spirit of revelation.
o   They had received many gifts.
o   They had been delivered of God from Jerusalem.
o   They had been saved from famine, sickness, and diseases.
o   They were strong in battle. 
o   They had been brought out of the bondage time after time.
o   They had prospered until they were rich.
·         This helps us gain insight to Mormon’s approach to editing his plates.
o   “Mormon reinforced this reading by framing the destruction within a prophecy. His editorial summary included the observation, ‘Their great city [was destroyed], which they said God could not destroy, because of its greatness. But behold, in one day it was left desolate’ (16:9-10). Here Mormon was referring to an exchange that took place at the story's beginning. There the people of Ammonihah had rejected Alma's message with the words, ‘We will not believe thy words if thou shouldst prophesy that this great city should be destroyed in one day.’ Mormon there commented, ‘Now they knew not that God could do such marvelous works, for they were a hard-hearted and a stiffnecked people"’ (Alma 9:4-5; see also the predictions at Alma 9:18; 10:23). Clearly, Ammonihah's destruction was a marvelous work of God manifesting his divine power and justice.” [6]
·         Once again, we get more insight to what happened to Lehi’s party as they travelled in the wilderness of the Arabian peninsula.
o   “It is important to add a few words about the kinds of vicissitudes that the party met along the way. Nephi said of their troubles that ‘we did ... wade through much affliction,’ afterward characterizing the hardships less vividly as ‘afflictions and much difficulty; (1 Nephi 17:1, 6). Later Book of Mormon authors who had consulted the full set of records added important details, speaking of the family's suffering from both ‘famine’ and ‘all manner of diseases’ while crossing the desert (Mosiah 1:17; Alma 9:22).
“These later Book of Mormon authors, who enjoyed access to the fuller account of the party's journey, preserve recollections of troubles that differ markedly from details in Nephi's rather full narrative of the trip from Jerusalem to Nahom. For instance, King Benjamin recalls that at certain points along the way party members ‘were smitten with famine’ (Mosiah 1:17). To be sure, the family had suffered from lack of food during the trip from the first camp to Nahom (see 1 Nephi 16:17–32, 39). But the word famine sounds a more ominous note. Moreover, Alma also writes of Lehi's party suffering ‘from famine’ as well as ‘from sickness, and all manner of diseases’ “ [7]
·         24-25 – How they will be destroyed.
o   24 – Promises of Lord extended to Lamanites; promises not extended to “you” if “you” sin; if “you” rebel against God, “you” will be utterly destroyed.
o   25 – Lord sent angel to visit people; kingdom of heaven at hand; they still may not be destroyed.
·         26-28 – Son of God shall come in glory.
o   26 – Son of God’s glory the glory of the Only Begotten of the Father; He is full of grace, equity, truth, patience, mercy, long-suffering, quick to hear cries and prayers of people.
o   27 – Redeem those who are baptized unto repentance.
o   28 – Way of the Lord at hand; all men reap rewards according to works, righteous – salvation; wicked – captivation of the devil.
o   Hugh Nibley observes:
§  “Notice, there are just two conditions, and he told us what righteousness is. He just said, as the Lord: grace, equity, truth, patience, mercy, long-suffering. These are the characteristics the Lord has shown us, and if they're righteous, they'll reap salvation to their souls. But if they've been evil—no.” [8]
·         30-34 – People angry with Alma2.
o   30 – Alma2 calls them his brethren; should bring forth works meet for repentance; hearts “grossly” hardened against word of God; a lost and fallen people.
o   31 – People angry with Alma2 because of his words.
o   32 – Wanted to put him in prison.
o   33 – Lord prevented them from placing him in prison.
o   34 – Amulek speaks to people.
o   Hugh Nibley comments on the response of the people of Ammonihah.
§  “This is the last call, and we don't like it either. Were the people satisfied with this? This made them mad as hornets, as the next verse [31] tells us. When he tells them frankly, he ends up by saying, ‘ye are a lost and a fallen people. Now it came to pass that when I, Alma, had spoken these words, behold the people were wroth with me because I said unto them that they were a hard-hearted and a stiffnecked people.’ “ [9]
o   Richard Dilworth Rust writes:
§  “Alma's closing plea lapses into resignation as his words fail to move the people of Ammonihah away from their path of self-destruction: ‘And now, my beloved brethren, for ye are my brethren, and ye ought to be beloved, and ye ought to bring forth works which are meet for repentance, seeing that your hearts have been grossly hardened against the word of God, and seeing that ye are a lost and a fallen people’ (Alma 9:30).
Given the people's earlier reactions and Alma's resignation about their fate, it is no surprise that the people of Ammonihah become angry and attempt to cast Alma into prison. From the first, these people deny and mock Alma's claims to authority.[10]

Chapter 10

Lehi descended from Manasseh—Amulek recounts the angelic command that he care for Alma—The prayers of the righteous cause the people to be spared—Unrighteous lawyers and judges lay the foundation of the destruction of the people. About 82 B.C.

Review of scriptures in Chapter 10

·         1-4 – Amulek introduces self; is known by the people.
o   Amulek a descendant of Aminadi.
§  Aminadi “interpreted the writing which was upon the wall of the temple, which was written by the finger of God” (verse 2).
§  We know nothing about Aminadi.  May have been mentioned in lost 116 manuscript pages.
o   Hugh Nibley made some observations about Amulek.
§  “So then Amulek stood forth and began to preach to them. Amulek introduced himself, and he is a very striking character. These vignettes, these character sketches in the Book of Mormon, are very clearly marked. He was the most respected citizen you could possibly imagine. He was a blueblood. Alma 10:2: ‘I am Amulek …  a descendant of Aminadi, . . . and Aminadi was a descendant of Nephi, who was the son of Lehi.’  He was proud of his genealogy. And here we have an extremely important genealogical note. Lehi was a descendant of Manasseh, who was half Egyptian … He had been a successful businessman, and made himself very rich. He had been very successful and very respected. He was la creme de la creme.” [11]
·         5-11 – Talks about his conversion.
o   5 – Never known much of the ways of the Lord.
o   6 – Was called many time but hardened heart and would not hear; continued to rebel against God.
o   7 – Angel appeared to him and told him about Alma2 coming to his house.
o   8 – Met Alma2 as he returned home.
o   10 – Testifies Alma2‘s words are true; angel made these things known to him.
o   11 - Alma2 blessed his house, his women, his children, his father, and his kinfolk.
o   We learn about Mesoamerican architecture in verse 11.
§  “Mesoamerican dwellings were basically compounds for multiple family units. How well does this archaeological feature fit with the rare Book of Mormon descriptions of dwelling units? We find the following in Alma: ‘For behold, he hath blessed mine house, he hath blessed me, and my women, and my children, and my father and my kinsfolk; yea, even all my kindred hath he blessed, and the blessing of the Lord hath rested upon us according to the words which he spake’ (Alma 10:11). When Amulek describes Alma's blessing, he paints a picture of how Amulek perceives his kin connections. These descriptions fit the general picture of Mesoamerican households…
“The first term Amulek uses is ‘my house.’ For kin-based societies, this typically is as real as it is symbolic of the family. Kin-based societies frequently live in compounds. Excellent documents allow anthropologists to visualize some Aztec households close to the time of the Conquest. … One account from 1580 indicates that houses typically contained six or seven married couples besides unmarried youth.
“The archaeological discovery of living areas that clearly contain multiple buildings led archaeologists to the conclusion that such an area was a family compound, which is a very common feature of the archaeological sites of the Maya area dating to the Book of Mormon time period … Amulek may plausibly have lived in a typical Mesoamerican household compound … When Amulek speaks first of Alma blessing his ‘house’ and then lists specific groups, we are justified in assuming that these are people who are living in the same ‘house,’ which would mean the entire dwelling area, not a single structure.” [12]
·         12-18 – Amulek serves as second witness; lawyers question them.
o   12 – People astonished there was more than one witness.
o   Dennis Largey explains:
§  “The people in Ammonihah rejected and ridiculed Alma and his message, but became astonished at the words of Amulek, "seeing that there was more than one witness that testified of the things whereof they were accused" (Alma 10:12; italics added). It was the second witness that astonished the people.” [13]
o   13-15 – Lawyers use cunning devices to “catch them in their words;” they seek to destroy Alma2 and Amulek.
o   Hugh Nibley comments:
§  Alma 10 is the legalistic chapter. It's on legalism and lawyers. It packs a real wallop and shows immense insight ... That's the whole business of lawyers—to make your side appear whatever it is … That's the skill of rhetoric. You can take either side and make it win. Whether it was good or bad had nothing to do with it; you won the case. That's what you are supposed to do. To make the worse appear the better reason shocked everybody. That's what we have here; this is way up in it …
“… It's frightening because these people make the rules as they go. They're the lawyers and they're free to move the goal post anytime they want, so they always win … they had [Amulek] in their clutches. They were going to weave a tangled net to get him.” [14]
o   17 – Amulek knows thoughts and designs of lawyers; calls them on their tricks.
o   18 – Lawyers are trying to pervert ways of the Lord.
·         19-22 – Good thing that government leaders chosen by the voice of the people; prayers of righteous prevent destruction.
o   19 – If people choose unrighteous leaders, they are ripe for destruction (Mosiah 29:27).
o   20 – Lord judge of their iniquities; voice of angel cry repentance.
o   22 – Prayers of righteous prevent destruction; will be by famine, pestilence, and the sword.
o   What does it mean when they are ripe for destruction?
§  “When iniquity ripens fully the cursings come. But what constitutes being ripe in iniquity? The Book of Mormon gives specific conditions: (1) when ‘the voice of this people should choose iniquity’ (Alma 10:19); (2) when the people ‘turn aside the just for a thing of naught and revile against that which is good, and say that it is of no worth’ (2 Nephi 28:16); (3) when they reject ‘every word of God’ (1 Nephi 17:35); and (4) ‘when [they] shall cast out the righteous from among [them], then shall [they] be ripe for destruction’ (Helaman 13:14).” [15]
·         23-24 – Cast out righteous and “you” will face destruction; people angry with Amulek.
o   23 – If righteous cast our, anger of the Lord will come out against you.
o   24 – People angry with Amulek because he challenges their “just laws” and “wise lawyers.
o   Ben Franklin had two thoughts that apply to the Ammonihahites.
§  A learned blockhead is a greater blockhead than an ignorant one.
§  Being ignorant is not so much a shame, as being unwilling to learn.
·         25-27 – Satan has great hold on their hearts; lawyers and judges lay foundation to destruction.
o   25 – Satan has great hold on their hearts; they are blinded to truth.
o   26 – Amulek speaks in favor of law; law condemns “you.”
o   27 – Foundation of unrighteousness is laid by judges and lawyers.
o   Hugh Nibley wrote:
§  “They would lay their legal traps, and if they failed to work, became righteously indignant. ‘This man doth revile against . . . our wise lawyers whom we have selected’ (Alma 10:24). ‘This man is a child of the devil, for . . . he hath spoken against our law. . . . And again, he has reviled against our lawyers, and our judges’ (Alma 10:28—29). Such men are dangerous enough on their own, but when their position becomes official (either in education or government) they have a powerful lever for achieving their aims by force, as Amulek observes: ‘the foundation of the destruction of this people is beginning to be laid by the unrighteousness of your lawyers and your judges’ (Alma 10:27).” [16]
·         28-32 – People cry out against Amulek, calling him a child of the devil.
o   28 – People know he is a child of the devil for speaking out against law.
o   29 – He has reviled lawyers and judges.
o   30 – Lawyers behind opposition.
o   31 – Zeezrom is introduced, being an expert.
o   32 – Purpose of lawyers was to get rich.
o   Hugh Nibley had this to say about Zeezrom.
§  “There it is. [Zeezrom] had associations, he had connections, he was making a lot of money, etc.—the typical lawyer. Back in those days did they do it exactly as we are doing it today … Yes, they did … ancient rhetoric was the training of lawyers for the law schools and the legislative courts. They worked right together, but you had to be a lawyer… It was thoroughly corrupt, and it destroyed the ancient world. He says the same thing is going to destroy them here. But this Zeezrom was the most expert…” [17]

Chapter 11

Nephite coinage set forth—Amulek contends with Zeezrom—Christ will not save people in their sins—Only those who inherit the kingdom of heaven are saved—All men shall rise in immortality—There is no death after the resurrection. About 82 B.C.

Review of scriptures in Chapter 11

·         1-3 – How wages were paid.
o   1 – Law of Mosiah set pay for judges.
o   2 – If a person was brought before judge, he was judged according to the law and evidence; a judgment would be rendered.
o   3 – Payment for judges identified.
o   Lindon Robinson comments about the importance of the monetary system.
§  “All economists recognize the importance of a currency or monetary system to facilitate trading. Thus, it is interesting that the Book of Mormon patiently explains the Nephite monetary system even though it is an odd topic to have included in a religious text. Moreover, Alma also explains how the Nephites used money—to pay their judges, to discharge debts, etc. (Alma 11:1–20).” [18]
·         4-21 – Nephite monetary system outlined.
o   Heading says “coinage set forth.” 
o   Did Nephites have coins?
o   Current chapter headings were  written in the 1980’s.
§  “Royal Skousen [the most expert scholar on the Book of Mormon translations and editions] says  ‘In the text proper, the gold and silver units are referred to as pieces, not coins … now these are the names of the different pieces of their gold and of their silver according to their value' (Alma 11:4). Here in Alma 11, there is no specific evidence for a coin system (that is, minted pieces of precious metal, with possibly images or writing, perhaps the stipulated weight, on the pieces).’ “ [19]
o   The text itself calls the gold and silver “pieces.”  We don’t know what they meant by  pieces.  But, the text is clear.  They are never referred to as “coins.”
o   Daniel Peterson gets the final word:
§  “And, by the way, for the umpteenth time, the Book of Mormon never claims that there were ‘coins’ in the ancient New World. The text of the Book of Mormon mentions neither the word coin nor any variant thereof. The reference to ‘Nephite coinage’ in the chapter heading to Alma 11 is not part of the original text and is mistaken. Alma 11 is almost certainly talking about standardized weights of metal—a historical step toward coinage, true, but not yet the real thing.” [20]
o   20 – To get more gain, judges and lawyers stirred up the people to wickedness and law breaking so they would need to be
o   21 – Zeezrom begins to question Amulek.
§  He was expert in the devices of the devil.
·         Thomas Valletta wrote:
o   “The unrighteousness of the Ammonihahite lawyers and judges consisted not so much in their chosen profession, but rather that ‘their hearts [were] set so much upon the things of this world"’ (D&C 121:35). The record is clear that it was their ‘sole purpose to get gain’ (Alma 11:20). Their law and their lucre had become their God. Their craving for the things of this world was so intense that ‘they did stir up the people to riotings, and all manner of disturbances and wickedness, that they might have more employ, that they might get money according to the suits which were brought before them’(Alma 11:20). Possibly this emphasis on ‘gain’ as a driving force of the order of Nehor was a major reason that Alma 11 includes the only extant scriptural account of the Nephite monetary system.” [21]
·         22-25 – Amulek agrees to answer questions; Zeezrom tempts him with money; Amulek sees his motivation.
o   22 – Amulek says he will answer “according to the Spirit of the Lord;” Zeezrom offers him six onties (a lot of money!) of silver to deny Supreme Being.
o   23 – Amulek calls him child of hell; righteous don’t yield to such temptation.
o   24 – He asks Zeezrom if he believes there is no God; Amulek answers he knows there is a God but loves money more.
o   25 – Zeezrom has lied before God; he wasn’t going to give him the six silver onties; for this evil, he will have his reward.
o   Hugh Nibley comments:
§  “He has it all set up. He asks a very crude question here. I mean if he is trying to be subtle, isn't this about as crude as you can get? He says, ‘Behold, here are six onties of silver, and all these will I give thee if thou wilt deny the existence of a Supreme Being?’ In front of all those people there, you see. Would he accept a bribe as conspicuously as that after his moral tirades, etc.? Well, of course he wouldn't. What is the guy planning to do? It lets us know what he's planning to do. As Amulek tells him, I know you had no intention to pay. What he was going to do was to up the ante  … He was going to offer him a fabulous amount, so people would think the guy was crazy for not taking it, whatever he believed. It's the corruptibility of the times. But Amulek said, I know you weren't going to pay it anyway, but I'm not going to accept it whatever it is. It seems like a rather crude approach, but you can see what he was doing. He had these people in the palms of his hands. It said he had much business with the people, and he was the most skillful lawyer in the place. He was the top man.” [22]
·         26-34There is a series of questions and answers between Amulek and Zeezrom.
o   26  - Zeezrom (Z) – You say there is a God?
o   27 – Amulek (A) – There is a true and living God.
o   28 – Z – Is there more than one God?
o   29 – A – No.
o   30 – Z – How do you know?
o   31 – A – An angel appeared to me and told me.
o   32 – Z – Should the Son of God come?
o   33 – A – Yes.
o   34 – Z – Will we be saved in our sins?
o   34 – A – No.  It is impossible for God to lie.
o   John Clark wrote that:
§   “… in his dialogue with Amulek, Zeezrom implied that people could be saved ‘in their sins’ (see Alma 11:34—37), and the people of Ammonihah, who were followers of Nehor, ‘did not believe in the repentance of their sins’ (Alma 15:15).” [23]
§  35-37 – Zeezrom points out Amulek’s “contradictions.”  (Editorial comment:  This reads much like an anti-Mormon tract!); Amulek points out he lies and explains why.
o   35 – Zeezrom claims inconsistencies in Amulek’s answers.
§  There is one God but he says Son of God will come.
§  God will not save us his people and he acts like he has authority to command God.
o   36 – Amulek points out his lies.
o   37 – I didn’t command God, I said He cannot save people in their sins.
o   38 – He repeats the statement God cannot save people in his sins.
§  He cannot deny His word and this is His word.
o   38 – God said you cannot be saved in your sins, so you cannot be saved in your sins.
o   Hugh Nibley observed:
§  “Now Zeezrom said unto the people: See that ye remember these things [watch that—we'll catch him on that]; for ‘he said there is but one God; yet he saith that the Son of God shall come, but he shall not save his people—as though he had authority to command God.’ Notice that he omits the part, ‘in their sins.’ He just leaves that out. He says don't say ‘in their sins’ is a typical lawyer question. Answer yes or no; will he save his people? Well, he won't save them in their sins. I didn't say "’n their sins’; leave that out. I'm just asking you a question. Answer me yes or no—will he save his people? Of course, it's a conditioned answer. This is a very favorite trick of lawyers. Their tricks are all easy, foolish, and transparent. They always work though, more or less.
“Then Amulek says you're the one that lies ‘for thou sayest that I spake as though I had authority to command God because I said he shall not save his people in their sins. And I say unto you again that he cannot save them in their sins [that's the thing he hadn't mentioned]; for I cannot deny his word …’ “ [24]
§  38-41 – Zeezrom’s questioning continues.
o   38 – Z - Is the Son of God the Eternal Father?
o   39 – A – Yes.  He is Eternal Father of all things, his beginning, the end, the first, the last.
o   40-41 – A continues – He will come into the world and redeem his people; He will take upon him the transgressions of those who believe on His name; wicked remain as if there was no redemption made; wicked will rise from dead; will stand before God and be judged according to their works.
o   Robert Millet explains.
§  “Jesus Christ is also known by the title of Father. The meaning of scriptures using this nomenclature is not always immediately clear, primarily owing to the fact that Christ and his Father are virtually inseparable in purpose, testimony, glory, and power. In most cases, however, the scriptural usage can be explained in several ways:
§  “Christ is sometimes called Father because of his role as Creator from the beginning. Before his mortal birth, and acting under the direction of the Father, Jesus was Jehovah, the Lord Omnipotent, through whom God created worlds without number (Moses 1:33; 7:30; John 1:1—3; Heb. 1:2). …, Christ-Jehovah is called ‘the Father of heaven and earth, the Creator of all things from the beginning’ in the Book of Mormon…
§  “Jesus Christ is also known as Father through the spiritual rebirth of mankind (see Born of God) … he became the ‘author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him’ (Heb. 5:9). He is the Savior. No person will come unto the Father except through him and by his name (John 14:6; Acts 4:12; Mosiah 3:17). Those who accept the gospel of Jesus Christ and receive its saving covenantal ordinances, living worthy of its sanctifying and enlightening powers, are "born again" unto Christ and become known as the children of Christ, "his sons and his daughters," his "seed" (Mosiah 5:5—8; 15:10—13; 27:25—26; Alma 5:14)…
§  “Furthermore, Jesus is called Father because of the authority God gave him to act for the Father. He explained in Jerusalem: ‘I can of mine own self do nothing . . . I am come in my Father's name"\’ (John 5:30, 43)…
§  “In addition, Christ is Father in that he literally inherited attributes and powers from his Father (Elohim). From Mary, his mother, Jesus inherited mortality, the capacity to die. From God, his Father, Jesus inherited immortality, the capacity to live forever: ‘As the Father hath life in himself; so hath he given to the Son to have life in himself’ (John 5:26; cf. Hel. 5:11). Christ is "the Father, because he was conceived by the power of God.’ (Mosiah 15:3)…
§  “Christ is also Father in that he spiritually received all that the Father has. I am in the Father, and the Father in me, and the Father and I are one—(D&C 93:3—4).” [25]
§  42-46 – Amulek talks about temporal death and resurrection.
o   42 – Physical death is temporal death; death of Christ loose bands of temporal death.
o   43 – Body and spirit will be reunited in perfect form; we will stand before God and have a “bright recollection of all our guilt.”
o   44 – Restoration come to all, old and young, bond and free, male and female, wicked and righteous; will be restored to its perfect frame; all will be arraigned before the bar of Christ and God the Father which is one Eternal God to be judged according to their works.
o   45 – Once body raise to immortal body, it can die no more and no more see corruption.
o   46 – When Amulek finished, people were astonished and Zeezrom began to tremble.
o   Douglas Callister writes:
§  Resurrection is as universal as death. All must die and all must be resurrected. It is a free gift to everyone. It is not the result of the exercise of faith or accumulated good works. The Book of Mormon prophet Amulek declares, ‘Now, this restoration shall come to all, both old and young, both bond and free, both male and female, both the wicked and the righteous.’ “ [26]


[1] Chart 126, The Law of Apostate Cities, Charting the Book of Mormon, John W. Welch and J. Gregory Welch.
[2] Lecture 47: Alma 5-10, Hugh W. Nibley, Maxwell Institute, accessed October 13, 2011.
[3] "We Did Again Take Our Journey", David A. LeFevre, Maxwell Institute, accessed October 14, 2011.
[4] A Case for Lehi's Bondage in Arabia. S. Kent Brown, Maxwell Institute, accessed October 14, 2011.
[5] Traditions of the Fathers, Daniel C. Peterson, Maxwell Institute, accessed October 15, 2011.
[6] Mormon as Editor. Grant R. Hardy, Maxwell Institute, accessed October 16, 2011.
[7] New Light from Arabia on Lehi's Trail, S. Kent Brown, Maxwell Institute, accessed October 16, 2011.
[8] Lecture 47: Alma 5-10, Hugh W. Nibley, Maxwell Institute, accessed October 17, 2011.
[10] "Know the Covenants of the Lord" – Sermons, Richard Dilworth Rust, Maxwell Institute, accessed October 17, 2011.
[11] Lecture 47: Alma 5-10. Hugh W. Nibley, Maxwell Institute, accessed October 18, 2011.
[12] Behind the Mask, Behind the Curtain: Uncovering the Illusion, Brant Gardner, Maxwell Institute, accessed October 18, 2011.
[13] The Book of Mormon, An Interpretive Guide to the New Testament, Dennis Largey, Maxwell Institute, accessed October 19, 2011.
[14] Lecture 48: Alma 10-12, Hugh W. Nibley, Maxwell Institute, accessed October 19, 2011.
[15] Hubris and Ate: A Latter-day Warning from the Book of Mormon, Richard D. Draper, Maxwell Institute, accessed October 20, 2011.
[16] The Way of the "Intellectuals", Hugh W. Nibley, Maxwell Institute, accessed October 21, 2011.
[17] Lecture 48: Alma 10-12, Hugh W. Nibley, Maxwell Institute, accessed October 21, 2011.
[18] Economic Insights from the Book of Mormon, Lindon J. Robison, Provo, Utah: Maxwell Institute, accessed October 22, 2011.
[19] Behind the Mask, Behind the Curtain: Uncovering the Illusion, Brant Gardner, Provo, Utah: Maxwell Institute, accessed October 22, 2011.
[20] Mormonism, Daniel C. Peterson, Provo, Utah: Maxwell Institute, accessed October 22, 2011.
[21] Conflicting Orders: Alma and Amulek in Ammonihah, Thomas R. Valletta, Provo, Utah: Maxwell Institute, accessed October 23, 2011.
[22] Lecture 48: Alma 10-12, Hugh W. Nibley, Provo, Utah: Maxwell Institute, accessed October 23, 2011.
[23] Painting Out the Messiah: The Theologies of Dissidents, John L. Clark, Provo, Utah: Maxwell Institute, accessed October 24, 2011.
[24] Lecture 48: Alma 10-12, Hugh W. Nibley, Provo, Utah: Maxwell Institute, accessed October 24, 2011.
[25] Jesus Christ, Fatherhood and Sonship of, Robert L. Millet, Provo, Utah: Maxwell Institute, accessed October 25, 2011.
[26] Resurrection, Douglas L. Callister, Provo, Utah: Maxwell Institute, accessed October 26, 2011.